Dawkins And Human Dignity 

Dawkins is in trouble for bringing the idea of the “sacred” human nature into question:


The critic (a sociologist) says there are three ways of looking at human nature; this corresponds to the division I set out in DR Part 1: Meditations On First Reactionary Philosophy. 
1: Theological View.

2: Rational-Idealistic View.

3: Naturalistic View.
However, what’s comic is that the sociologist (Evans) wants us to view humans as sacred, while not using any kind of theological foundation. A noble lie in other words. What’s even more comical is that Evans points to “constitutions” and “secular” documents” as proof of no religious influence. 
Of course, in reality, human rights, dignity and sacredness evolved from Christian  concepts. 
All this is either forgotten, or suppressed, or ignored. 


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s