How Trump Won Part 9B: The Crocodile Circus

Tick Tock Tick Tock

In France, we have the Communist Clown Hollande:

“Ending austerity was just one of the pledges Hollande made when he addressed thousands of supporters in the Place de la Bastille in Paris on the evening of 6 May .’I am the president of the youth of France! I am the president of all the collective pride of France!’ he thundered. ‘Carry this message far! Remember for the rest of your life this great gathering at the Bastille because it must give a taste to other peoples, to the whole of Europe, of the change that is coming. In all the capitals, beyond government leaders and state leaders, there are people who, thanks to us, are hoping, are looking to us and want to put an end to austerity.’

President for youth indeed, especially when one considers the youth who were massacred, tortured and dismembered in the Bataclan night club, and the children who were crushed to death in the streets of Nice:

According to this testimony, Wahhabist killers reportedly gouged out eyes, castrated victims, and shoved their testicles in their mouths. They may also have disemboweled some poor souls. Women were reportedly stabbed in the genitals – and the torture was, victims told police, filmed for Daesh or Islamic State propaganda. For that reason, medics did not release the bodies of torture victims to the families, investigators said.

Running for their lives, and their children’s lives:

One mother, called Linda, told France’s iTélé: “My husband picked up the kids and started running, I turned around and just saw so many dead people. I even saw a baby with its head totally crushed.” 


Apart from all that, Hollande has done nothing to help France’s woeful economy, or its endemic corruption:

The other side of the coin, incompetence, is epitomised by hapless outgoing current President Francois Hollande, a leader so gormless that in November 2016 he had a personal approval rating of just 4%, a subterranean low unequalled in the history of the Fifth Republic.

(President of “all the collective pride of France” indeed.)

Bowing to electoral reality, in December 2016 Hollande surrendered, not even bothering to try to run for a re-election he stood absolutely no chance of winning.

The main reason for this was his pathetic failure to even begin to substantially reform the sclerotic French economy. During his tenure, France has lost a further 600,000 jobs. In 2016, France grew at an anaemic 1.1% of GDP, in line with its lacklustre 1.2% in 2015. Stunningly, as of January 2017, more than one in four workers under 25 is jobless. The world is simply passing the French economy by.

The Corrupt Communist Clowns will end up giving away the Entire Circus to Le Pen:

There is no doubting that Marine Le Pen, the charismatic, firebrand leader of the xenophobic Front National (FN) has a great story to tell about both French elite corruption and incompetence.

The corruption portion of the populist narrative is beyond dispute. Beyond Fillon, former President Jacques Chirac and former Prime Minister Alain Juppe were given suspended sentences for corruption. Former Finance Minister and current IMF chief Christine Lagarde was found guilty of negligence for approving a massive payout of taxpayer money to a controversial French businessman. Former President Nicolas Sarkozy is presently under investigation for alleged illegal campaign funding. In reading this doleful list, sometimes I truly wonder if there is anyone left in power in France who has behaved honourably.

All Le Pen needs are five more years of economic failure, and then she has all the chance in the world to win the presidency next time, especially as her narrative of elite incompetence and corruption hardens into certainty for the French electorate. Le Pen is merely betting on is things staying as they are, with the talented, youthful Macron (he is only 39) unable to drag his country into the twenty-first century. Given France’s recent past history, that is more than a reasonable bet to make.

Yeah, that a couple of really juicy, really wicked as shit terror attacks: a school, a celebrity and their family; a massacre of sociology students; an army barracks that goes boom boom boom.

Do the Clown realise how close to collapse the circus is?

This is what Hollande is saying privately about Islam:

“.. “no one can doubt there is a problem with Islam.”….France’s Socialist president echoes the same reactionary language as the country’s extremist Front National.”

Hollande and thus the entire political class is lying about Islam.

Why are they lying?

Tick Tock Tick Tock

In Italy, meanwhile, we have the political “autist”Matteo Renzi:

“Renzi’s hubris is typical of a type of politician to be found all over Europe right now….

Part of a pattern, just like in America.

“Romanian political scientist Valentin Naumescu observes on Contributors:

Intuition should be part of the talent, competence and values of any national or European political leader.

(Which is what Trump has, as I argued here and here.)

Before taking action the how, why and whether to take this action at all must be clarified. You don’t just press buttons randomly to see what happens. Both Renzi and [British ex-prime minister] Cameron have proved to be politicians who lack intuition. … Neither of them would have called the referendums had they known that they would lose them. The logical conclusion is that all those leaders who thought that they would be backed by their voters on this issue and then even praised reinforce the idea that the current generation of politicians in Europe is autistic.

De Groene Amsterdammer concludes:

During his three-year ego trip Matteo Renzi lost sight of his country and its population. He thought he was dealing with an Italy that doesn’t exist. The non-elected prime minister constantly congratulated himself on achievements that no one experienced. Things did not improve for the people. The number of jobs didn’t go up and taxes didn’t go down. On the contrary. … So the enslaved people rose up against him. … Eighty-one percent of those aged between 18 and 34 who are unemployed in the south of the country – where various Mafia organisations offer the only work to be had – said No.

The Italians said NO because:

“In the past 20 years changes have always resulted in a lower quality of life.”

We have now had three voting upsets: first the British General Election of 2015; then Brexit; then Trump and now the Italian referendum. In all three, the experts and politicians involved have seriously misjudged the mood of the people.

Tick Tock Tick Tock

Angela Merkel, Europe’s paramount Clown, was on pure Communist crack when she made her decision to let one million Muslims into Germany in 2015.

Let’s take two examples from Germany itself (never mind the rest of the world) that show how seemingly insane her decision was.

(I said “seemingly insane” only if you think that there is supposed to be some connection between democratic government and good government. But if you look at Merkel, as you should all democratic politicians, not as MAD but as Machiavellians, you will see that what is madness and murder is often cunning manoeuvres in the game of power.)

Firstly, the lead hijackers of the 9/11 attack were “radicalised” in German mosques — thus demonstrating, more than twenty years ago, the problem of radical Islam in Germany.  (See Terry McDermott’s Perfect Soldiers.)  

Secondly, Germany has faced terror threats from Jihadists even when Merkel was Supreme Leader.

For example, there was a major terror plot foiled in 2007:

Merkel, however, unilaterally decided to allow one million Muslims (many, if not most, of whom were young males) into Germany during, well, wartime. Just imagine Germany letting in during the Second World War all those vulnerable Russian males fleeing Stalin’s terror. What would the poor dears get-up-to with all those pretty little blond maidens?

“Soldier: You are now on German soil. The hour of revenge has struck!”

Merkel raped these women:

October 1. Two migrants raped a 23-year-old woman in Lüneburg as she was walking in a park with her young child. The men, who remain at large, forced the child to watch while they took turns assaulting the woman.

October 2. A 19-year-old migrant raped a 90-year-old woman as she was leaving a church in downtown Düsseldorf. Police initially described the suspect as “a Southern European with North African roots.” It later emerged that the man is a Moroccan with a Spanish passport.

October 6. More than 400 residents of the Altenessen district in Essen met local politicians in a televised “town hall meeting” to discuss spiraling violence and crime perpetrated by migrants in the area. Residents complained that police often refuse to respond to calls for help and begged city officials to restore order. One resident said: “I was born here and I do not feel safe anymore.” City officials flatly rejected the complaints. Mayor Thomas Kufen said: “Altenessen is not a no-go area, the people here are just angry.” Police Chief Frank Richter added: “I am sick and tired of hearing about no-go zones in Essen.” He insisted that Essen und Altenessen are perfectly safe.

October 10. Jaber al-Bakr, a 22-year-old refugee from Syria, was arrested after police found explosives in his apartment in Chemnitz. He was suspected of plotting to bomb an airport in Berlin. Two days later, he hanged himself in a jail in Leipzig.

October 15. A Syrian migrant disrupted a wedding at the Karmel Church in downtown Duisburg. He burst into the building and began fondling a statue of the Virgin Mary while shouting “Allahu Akhbar” (“Allah is the greatest.”) After undergoing a psychological evaluation, the man was released. The incident is one of a growing number in which Muslim migrants have disrupted or vandalized German churches.

October 16. A 16-year-old boy and his 15-year-old girlfriend were walking along the banks of the Alster, a lake in the heart of Hamburg, when a stranger ambushed him from behind and plunged a knife into his back. The attacker then pushed the girl into the water and walked away. The girl survived, but the boy died of his wounds. The suspect, a “southern-looking” (südländischer Erscheinung) man in his early twenties, remains at large. Police say the victims were not robbed and there is no evident motive for the crime: The suspect appears to have randomly stabbed the boy just because he felt like it. The Islamic State later claimed responsibility for the murder, but German police cast doubt on that claim.

October 17. The German Press Council reprimanded the weekly newspaper, Junge Freiheit, for revealing the nationality of three Afghan teenagers who raped a woman at a train station in Vienna, Austria, in April 2016. The press council said the nationality of the perpetrators was “not relevant” to the case, and by revealing this information the newspaper “deliberately and pejoratively represented the suspects as second-class persons.” In the interests of “fair reporting,” the council demanded that the newspaper remove the offending item from its website. The newspaper refused to comply, and said it would continue to publish the nationalities of criminal suspects.

The Rape of Cologne.

As Richard Fernandez described (see here), when the security system fails, then the information, or propaganda, system must carry the load — which is to deny, distort and misreport the problems. The problem being the rape of German women as a consequence of Merkel’s decision, with the entire backing of the entire political establishment.

This is exactly what happened:

And it continues:

Merkel, and her minions, have not only lied about the sex attacks, she herself has lied about refugees and political violence as well.

Here is a clear example of her dishonesty.

According to Reuters, Merkel said:

“Chancellor Angela Merkel said on Wednesday refugees had not brought terrorism to Germany, adding that Islam belonged in the country as long as it was practiced in a way that respected the constitution.

More than a million people fleeing war and poverty in the Middle East, Africa and elsewhere arrived in Germany last year. The mood towards them has soured after a spate of attacks on civilians last month, including three carried out by migrants.

Her lies were contradicted in the second paragraph!

And, of course, we had the Berlin Christmas market attack, where a Muslim “refugee” used a lorry to crush Germans at a Christmas market:

Merkel raped these women:

The police report on the Cologne attacks, which was written by a senior official at the scene, describes a chaotic situation in which the officers found themselves outnumbered by “several thousand men.” Police were largely powerless to protect the women, who were forced to navigate an “obstacle course through a mass of severely drunk men that is beyond description.”

Though the police questioned dozens of suspects, they made only a handful of arrests, none of which were connected to the sexual assaults. Witnesses reported that some of the assailants shouted “f**k the police” and spat at officers.

In the report, one suspect is quoted as saying: “I’m Syrian, you have to treat me nicely. Frau Merkel invited me.”

Merkel killed these people:

Fabrizia Di Lorenzo –“The 31-year-old Italian national, who had lived and worked in Berlin for several years, is believed to have died in the attack.”


An Israeli woman, Dalia Elyakim, has also been identified as being among the victims, according to Israel’s foreign ministry. Elyakim was visiting Berlin with her husband, Rami, who was seriously wounded in the attack but is now stable.

The couple, in their 60s, are from the central Israeli city of Herzliya. They “loved to travel, especially around Christmas time,” said Moshe Egoz, a longtime friend. Egoz, who said he had been following their trip to Berlin through her posts on Facebook. Elyakim was a “good soul”, he said.”

Collateral Damage.

Merkel, despite everything, still wants more Muslims

Tick Tock Tick Tock

The UN Clown Show.

Here is more lies and deceit, this time from a United Nations’s special rapporteur, Ben Emmerson:

The United Nations’ special rapporteur for counterterrorism and human rights unveiled a 23-page report Friday arguing that there’s “no evidence” tough immigration policies stop terrorism.

Ben Emmerson, a London barrister whose experience includes the Khmer Rouge tribunal and the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia. was appointed to the position in 2011. In a UN address Friday, Emmerson said his report found “overly restrictive migration policies introduced because of terrorism concerns are not justified and may in fact be damaging to state security.”

While there is no evidence that migration leads to increased terrorist activity, migration policies that are restrictive or that violate human rights may in fact create conditions conducive to terrorism,” he said.

“This perception is analytically and statistically unfounded.”

We keep hearing this phrase “no evidence” and its nonsense.

The man is hoist on his own petard when he says that immigration control “may in fact create conditions conducive to terrorism.” Does he any evidence for that claim?

Here is the simple, but harsh truth. If Muslims – all Muslims – were never allowed into the United States, then there would never have been a 9/11 and thus no war on terror and thus all those dead Muslims – now over a million – would still be alive.

Is that a justifiable trade-off? You decide.

However, as for the claim that refuges, migrants, immigrants – first and second generation – do not carry out acts of political violence, well:

I wonder if Ben Emmerson considers those dead Europeans “statistically unfounded”?

Tick Tock Tick Tock

The New York Times Clown Show.

Nicholas Kristof writes for the New York Times.

Nicholas Kristof is a very, very, very smart man.

Here is how the Times describes this Brahmin:

He grew up on a farm in Oregon, graduated from Harvard, studied law at Oxford University as a Rhodes Scholar, and then studied Arabic in Cairo. He was a longtime foreign correspondent for The New York Times and speaks Chinese, Japanese and other languages.

Mr. Kristof has won two Pulitzer Prizes for his coverage of Tiananmen Square and the genocide in Darfur, along with many humanitarian awards such as the Anne Frank Award and the Dayton Literary Peace Prize.

As I said, A very smart man.

I am not a Rhodes Scholar; I am a Rogue Scholar; I’m gonna rip your spiel to shreds.

Piss on your Pulitzer.

Kristof urges his readers to “resist” the President’s “tantrums” and focus on matters of “life and death.”

Yes, let’s focus on life and death.

Kristof writes:

Consider two critical issues: refugees and guns. Trump is going berserk over the former, but wants to ease rules on the latter. So let’s look at the relative risks.

In the four decades between 1975 and 2015, terrorists born in the seven nations in Trump’s travel ban killed zero people in America, according to the Cato Institute. Zero.

In that same period, guns claimed 1.34 million lives in America, including murders, suicides and accidents. That’s about as many people as live in Boston and Seattle combined.

It’s also roughly as many Americans as died in all the wars in American history since the American Revolution, depending on the estimate used for Civil War dead.

The President is going “berserk”? Don’t you just love that framing?

When someone goes “berserk” I think of this:

For Syria:

The threat of terror, in London, and throughout England remains “severe”; or so says the Metropolitan police.

These attacks, by people who really are “berserk”, are part of a wider pattern:

Kristof is not really troubled by this sort of thing – intellectually, or emotionally. As a Brahmin, as a man of a particular class,  earned by graduating from Harvard; writing for the Times; winning a Pulitzer Prize and writing about things that men and women of his class care care care about like “Human rights, women’s rights, health, global affairs.”

No. What really troubles a man like Kristof is because President Trump is not a Brahmin.

Kristof’s contempt for President Trump – contempt because of class – has compelled him to write such intellectually dishonest idiocy.

Let’s take a close look Kristof’s reasoning:

In the four decades between 1975 and 2015, terrorists born in the seven nations in Trump’s travel ban killed zero people in America, according to the Cato Institute. Zero.

What to make of this passage? What’s wrong with it? Firstly, the overall goal here is to paint Trump as an idiot, as a bigot, as “berserk”. Notice the focus on the number “zero”, and the number which follows: “1.34.”

Like wow. What a difference you are expected to say.

Secondly, his claim that none of the terrorists born in the seven nations in the travel ban have killed zero Americans between 1975 and 2015, implicitly – or surreptitiously, rather – leads us to draw the conclusion that there is no reason to ban potential terrorists from these countries.

Kristof wants to persuade us that Trump is an idiot; his writing, like all of his ilk,  is laced with rhetorical techniques, and hidden, unquestioned, assumptions.

But is Kristof’s reasoning logical? Is it sensible? Is Kristof’s conclusion, which he wants us to draw, regarding the travel ban – that it is “morally repugnant,” sound? That it is prudent?


Kristof reasons that because “zero” Americans were killed in a 40-year period by folks from the countries that President Trump imposed the ban upon there will be “zero”, or, perhaps, only 10, 20, 100 or 2,996 people killed in the future.

Every day, in the Chicken’s life, the same hand fed it; however, one day, the exact same hand was the hand that wrung its neck.

President Trump’s travel ban’s purpose is to prevent potential attacks from potential terrorists.

Statistical evidence, however true, is not necessarily accurate or even a reliable guides to the future. Its called the problem of induction, surely a Harvard man like Kristof must have heard of it.

How many Americans, I wonder, had Japanese people killed between 1901 and 1941? Maybe zero? Maybe a couple of Yankees in a bar fight? The nips can do karaoke and Karate after all.

On December 7, 1941, how many Americans did Japanese people kill, however?

Answer: 68.

Not a lot, to be sure. I’m sure the Kristofs of that era were more concerned about bathtubs and ladders back then too:

“The bottom line is that most years in the U.S., ladders kill far more Americans than Muslim terrorists do. Same with bathtubs. Ditto for stairs. And lightning.”

But wait.

What were the consequences of that little act of hostility on the part of Japanese people?

Here is one consequence.

Here is another. 

Bit more serious than bathtubs and ladders don’t you think?

Since Kristof is so concerned with Muslim welfare – which he should be as a good Universalist – he should spend more time cogitating over the following number:

1.3 million.

Roughly the same death toll he cites with gun deaths. However, his number is American gun deaths over a 40 year period; my number, meanwhile, is for the death toll from the global war on terror.

Hey Kristof!

It has only been 16 years!!!

Suppose we use your inductive logic and extend that out to a forty-year period. What do we get?

Why, its (only) what? 3 and bit million dead Muslims! Many of them women and children – but who cares, Kristof doesn’t.

A couple of million deaths is pretty low- ball, however, compared to the 1941-1945 meat factory fun-party.

What, however, if we extend this reasoning out for the rest of the century? (Why, you don’t think this is going away any time soon?)

So, 19 terrorists  from countries that America was, and still is, allied with – Saudi Arabia and Egypt – have played a pivotal, causal role in the deaths of over a million people – so far.

Yes. Yes. Yes. Kristof would no doubt reply that America overreacted…. and it should have…. Should have….. done… what… exactly?

The hidden, unexamined, assumption that Kristof’s reasoning contains is that America is not at war.

But America is at war.

It does not matter what Kristof thinks should happen, or would happen if he were in charge of USG.

The truth is that USG is an 800 pound Alpha male gorilla – with permanent resting bitch face – and it sits and shits where it wants.

If USG wants to toy with Muslims by bombing a few funerals or marriage ceremonies with drones operated by people using joysticks while sipping red bull then that is what it does. If USG wants to, say, water-board Muslims, it can do so. If USG wants to, say, throw every single Muslim, like every single dirty Jap, into a concentration camp (Sorry, I meant “internment” camp) it can do so.

If USG wants to drop a “Fat Boy” over Fallujah, who the fuck is going to stop it?

Certainly not Nicholas-fucking -Kristof of the New York Fucking Times.

If President Trump is berserk then so is USG; if USG is berserk, then FDR was berserk; if FDR was berserk, then so was Woodrow Wilson.

If this 800 pound alpha male gorilla – armed with phalanx of Fat Boys – is berserk, then why would anyone – anyone sane, rational and prudent – ever want to poke-poke-poke provoke?

I mean, you could say that pricking a gorilla with a safety pin is not all that bad; maybe the gorilla could “manage” the situation.

This gorilla is an alpha male, however; armed with FAT BOYS, alas.

I mean, if say, one smart, young Muslim immigrant from Pakistan – who studied physics at Caltech – builds a Fat Boy on his Farm and decides to seriously fuck up New York, and then the gorilla decides to………….

Inconceivable ? 

Muslims didn’t kill (many) Americans in the 1970’s because they “weren’t” at war (much) with America.

But today, many are.

And all it takes is one, or 19.

And we are off to the races….

Run Rabbit Run.

Morally repugnant?

Was FDR morally repugnant?

Was Obama morally repugnant for dealing out the death cards and doling out the drone strikes?

Doesn’t-Mr-Pulitzer-prize-winning-motherfucker-not-realise-there-is-a-fucking-war on?

Then we have this beauty:

Correction: February 12, 2017 

An earlier version of this column said the risk of an American being killed last year by a Muslim terrorist was one in 17 million. That was for 2015; in 2016, the risk was about one in six million.

So, in the space of one year, the threat level went from one in 17 million to one in six million. Quite a jump.

Would it have anything to do with the practice of importing more and more Muslims?

What would the threat level look like if America imported 100 million Muslims? What would it look like if America imported 200 million? 

If it is true that the more Muslims you have in your country, the more likely there will be violence, then is it not likely that the gorilla is all the more likely to, well, you know……

Does Kristof want America to be like France, with its permanent national emergency?

Just imagine


a President Trump,

or a President Bannon,

or a President Fascist or a General Julius

could do with a NATIONAL EMERGENCY

Mr I-went-to-Harvard-and-won-a-Pulitzer-prize-twice-Nicholas-I-write-for-The-New-York-Times- Kristof?

Carry on Comrade.

Carry on you Crack-Addicted-Communist- Clown.

Carry on feeding-all-those-lovely-little-Muslim-children-to-that-big-fat-fucking-crocodile.

Tick Tock Tick Tock


One thought on “How Trump Won Part 9B: The Crocodile Circus

  1. Pingback: How Trump Won Part 9e: Imperium in Imperio. | "The Horror! The Horror!"

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s